SpaceX Statistics
Jump to: Launches | Landings | Pads | Reusability | Dragon 1 | Crew Dragon | Cargo Dragon 2 | Starlink
Changelog:
- Sep 16, 2023 – Stats updated after the Starlink 6-16 launch
- Sep 12, 2023 – Stats updated after the Starlink 7-2 launch
- Sep 9, 2023 – Stats updated after the Starlink 6-14 launch
- Sep 4, 2023 – Stats updated after the Starlink 6-12 launch and Crew-6 return
- Sep 2, 2023 – Stats updated after the SDA Tranche 0 L2 launch
- Sep 1, 2023 – Stats updated after the Starlink 6-13 launch
- Aug 27, 2023 – Stats updated after the Starlink 6-11 launch
ASOG = A Shortfall of Gravitas (droneship), OCISLY = Of Course I Still Love You (droneship), JRTI = Just Read the Instructions (droneship), LZ = Landing Zone (on land), F9 = Falcon 9, FH = Falcon Heavy, LEO = Low Earth Orbit, GTO = Geostationary Transfer Orbit, GEO = Geostationary Earth Orbit
Launches
Launches Total (excl. Amos-6)
268 (5x Falcon 1, 256x Falcon 9, 7x Falcon Heavy)
Launches by Year
1 (2006), 1 (2007), 2 (2008), 1 (2009), 2 (2010), 0 (2011), 2 (2012), 3 (2013), 6 (2014), 7 (2015), 8 (2016), 18 (2017), 21 (2018), 13 (2019), 26 (2020), 31 (2021), 61 (2022), 65 (2023)
Mission Success (incl. Amos-6)
98.14% (Total); 40% (Falcon 1); 99.22 % (Falcon 9); 100% (Falcon Heavy)
Successful Launches since Last Mission Failure (Amos-6)
235
Most Launches in a Calendar Year
65 (2023)
Most Launches in a Calendar Quarter
22 (Q2 and Q3 2023)
Most Launches in a Calendar Month
9 (May 2023)
Shortest Time Between Launches
4h 12m (Starlink 2-8 / SES-18/SES-19)
Shortest Time Between Launches from Same Pad
3d 21h 11m (Intelsat Galaxy 37 / Starlink 6-8)
Highest Mass Launched to LEO
17,400+ kg (Starlink 5-2 and similar)
Highest Mass Launched to GTO on a Falcon 9
7,350 kg (Intelsat Galaxy 33/34)
Highest Mass Launched to GTO on a Falcon Heavy
~9,200 kg (Jupiter-3)
Highest Mass Launched to GEO on a Falcon Heavy
~6,750 kg (Viasat-3 Americas)
Lowest Mass Launched on a Falcon 9
330 kg (IXPE)
Shortest Time Between Static Fire (with Payload) and Launch:
19h 2m (Starlink 5-2)
Shortest Time Between Static Fire (without Payload) and Launch:
67 hours (Amos-17)
Shortest Time Between Two Different Static Fires:
15h 30m (Starlink v1-9 / GPSIII-SV03)
Booster Landings
» Detailed List of All SpaceX Booster Landings
Landing Attempts Total
237 (Total) – 188 (droneship), 49 (land)
Successful Landings Total
226 (Total) – 178 (droneship), 48 (land)
Most Landing Successes in a Row
152 (current streak which began after Starlink v1-19)
Landing Success Rate Overall
95.34% (Overall), 33.3% (2015), 62.5% (2016), 100% (2017), 85.7% (2018), 93.75% (2019), 92% (2020), 96.77% (2021), 100% (2022), 100% (2023)
Landing Success Rate (on land)
97.96%
Landing Success Rate (on droneship)
94.65%
Landing Attempts on OCISLY
78 (7 of those were unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on JRTI (both Marmac 300 and 303)
65 (3 of those were unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on ASOG
45 (0 of those were unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on LZ-1
30 (1 of those was unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on LZ-2
7 (0 of those were unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on LZ-4
12 (0 of those were unsuccessful)
Booster(s) with the Highest Number of Successful Landings
B1058, B1060 (16 landings)
Farthest distance during ASDS landing (F9)
690 km (JRTI during O3b mPOWER 2)
Farthest distance during ASDS landing (FH)
1234 km (OCISLY during STP-2)
Shortest Time Between Landing Attempts on OCISLY
8d 6h 4m (Nusantara Satu / DM-1)
Shortest Time Between Landing Attempts on JRTI
7d 18h 50m (Starlink 6-4 / Starlink 5-11)
Shortest Time Between Landing Attempts on ASOG
8d 0h 51m (Starlink 6-13 / Starlink 6-14)
F9 Landing with Highest Payload Mass to GTO
7,350 kg (Intelsat Galaxy 33/34)
F9 Landing with Highest Payload Mass to LEO
17,400+ kg (Starlink 5-2 and similar)
Launch Pads
Launches from LC-39A: 69
Launches from SLC-40: 143 (excl. Amos-6)
Launches from SLC-4E: 51
Launches from Kwajalein: 5
Shortest Time Between Launches from LC-39A
8d 23h 5m (OneWeb F15 / Starlink 4-37)
Shortest Time Between Launches from SLC-40
3d 21h 11m (Intelsat Galaxy 37 / Starlink 6-8)
Shortest Time Between Launches from SLC-4E
9d 9h 44m (Transporter-8 / Starlink 5-7)
Shortest Time Between Launches from Kwajalein
57 days (between the 3rd and 4th Falcon 1 launch)
Shortest Time Between Launch and Next Static Fire (LC-39A)
6d 5h 20m (BulgariaSat-1 / Intelsat 35e)
Shortest Time Between Launch and Next Static Fire (SLC-40)
5d 17h 49m (Starlink 4-27 / Starlink 4-23)
Shortest Time Between Launch and Next Static Fire (SLC-4E)
28 days (DART / Starlink 4-4)
Dragon 1
Dragon 1 Missions (incl. COTS)
22
Highest Upmass on a Dragon 1 CRS Mission
3,138 kg (CRS-8)
Lowest Upmass on a Dragon 1 CRS Mission
400 kg (CRS-1)
Longest Dragon 1 Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
CRS-9 (39d 11h 3m)
Shortest Dragon 1 CRS Mission (excl. CRS-7)
CRS-1 (20d 18h 48m)
Dragon 1 Recoveries
12 (6 of them once, 3 twice, 3 thrice)
Missions with a Reused Dragon 1
9
Reused Dragon 1 Capsules
6
Dragon 1 Capsules with the Most Launches
C106, C108 and C112 (3 missions)
Quickest Dragon 1 Turnaround (Splashdown to Launch)
418 days (CRS-16 / CRS-20)
Reusability
» Overview of All Block 5 Falcon Boosters
» Detailed List of All Fairing Recoveris
Number of Booster Reuses
198
Launches with a Reused Booster
193 (Total) – 5 (2017), 12 (2018), 8 (2019), 21 (2020), 29 (2021), 56 (2022), 61 (2023)
Share of F9/FH Launches with Reused Booster
73.38% (Total), 27% (2017), 57% (2018), 69.23% (2019), 80.77% (2020), 93.55% (2021), 91.8% (2022), 93.85% (2023)
Quickest Booster Turnaround (Launch-Launch or Launch-Static Fire)
21d 6h 16m (B1062.6, Ax-1 / Starlink 4-16)
Booster(s) with Most Launches
B1058, B1060 (16 launches)
Maximum Altitude Reached by a Booster
247 km (Formosat-5)
Fairing Catch Attempts with Net
32 (9 of those were successful)
Number of Fairing Half Reuses
245+
Missions with at Least One Reused Fairing
128+
Highest Number of Reuses for a Particular Fairing
11
Share of F9/FH Launches with at Least One Reused Fairing (excl. Dragon)
11.11% (2019), 38% (2020), 68% (2021), over 83.93% (2022), over 86.44% (2023)
Crew Dragon
Crew Dragon Missions
13
People Transported to Orbit
42
Crew Dragon Recoveries
12
Total Count of Crew Dragon Reuses
7
Crew Dragon Capsule(s) with the Most Launches
C206 (4 missions)
Quickest Crew Dragon Turnaround (Splashdown to Launch)
137 days (C207, Crew-1 / Inspiration4)
Longest Crew Dragon Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
Crew-2 (199 days)
Shortest Crew Dragon Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
Inspiration4 (71 hours)
Cargo Dragon 2
Cargo Dragon 2 Missions
8
Highest Upmass on a Cargo Dragon 2 Mission
3,528 kg (CRS-26)
Highest Downmass on a Cargo Dragon 2 Mission
2,002 kg (CRS-21)
Longest Cargo Dragon 2 Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
38d 9h 9m (CRS-21)
Cargo Dragon 2 Recoveries
7
Missions with a Reused Cargo Dragon 2
5
Dragon 2 Capsules with the Most Launches
C208 (4 missions)
Quickest Cargo Dragon 2 Turnaround (Splashdown to Launch)
164 days (C209, CRS-22 / CRS-24)
Starlink
Satellites Launched
5113 (Total) – 2 (Tintin), 60 (Starlink v0.9), 1665 (Starlink v1.0), 3009 (Starlink v1.5), 399 (Starlink v2-mini)
Satellites Deorbited (as of Sep 16, 2023)
349 (Total) – 2 (Tintin), 60 (Starlink v0.9), 187 (Starlink v1.0), 85 (Starlink v1.5), 15 (Starlink v2-mini)
If you find a mistake or want to suggest a new statistic to track, let me know in the comments below!
I think “Most Landing Successes in a Row” should be 23, not 1. Great work, anyway!
You’re right. I somehow accidentally merged the stats for most successes in a row and successful landings since last failure. Thanks for letting me know, it’s fixed now.
Good Job! Congrats!
The dragon 2 has been reused (oh nvm it says cargo dragon)
Great statistics! Great work collecting and organizing all of it.
Suggestions:
Thanks!
Thanks for the suggestions but most of the stats you’re asking for are impossible to track by the public. And I’m not planning on tracking stats for other companies.
But I’ve added a legend for the abbreviations used.
I believe Inspiration4 and Starlink 2-1 have beaten the “Shortest time between launches” record
You’re right! I haven’t updated any of the stats with Inspiration4 data yet. Will do it soon.
Recovered Dragons 1
12 (6 of them once, 3 twice, 3 thrice)
“Dragons 1” is just odd. It should probably mimic “Dragon 1 Missions”, like “Dragon 1 Recoveries”.
Recovered Crew Dragons
5
Makes it sound like there are five capsules. Should probably mimic “Crew Dragon Missions”, like “Crew Dragon Recoveries”.
Crew Dragon Reuses
2
I’m not certain what this is tracking. If it means what “Dragon 1 Capsules with the Most Launches” means, then I think it’s correct as both Resilience and Endeavour now have two missions each. And the stat should probably be called “Crew Dragon Capsules with the Most Launches”.
If it means the equivalent of “Reused Cargo Dragon 2 Capsules”, then it should probably be “Reused Crew Dragon Capsules”, though this stat is just going to be the number of Crew Dragons built, minus any SpaceX haven’t got around to re-launching, which, unlike “Crew Dragon Capsules with the Most Launches”, is an uninteresting stat.
“Shorthest Dragon 1 CRS Mission” -> “Shortest”
You also have 98.42% for Falcon 9’s mission success rate. Given the extensive differences between the blocks, I think I’d break that down into F9 V1.0, F9 V1.1 and F9 v1.2+, as delineated by OML changes (read: tank stretches) between the versions.
You also seem to lack a list of “SpaceX Recovery Vessels”. With ASOG debuting, and Bob and Doug soon coming online, a dedicated page with pics and a bit of history (e.g. why Marmac 300 and 303 are called JRTI) might be of interest.
Cheers.
Thanks for the feedback! I’ve made some changes based on your suggestions. As for the details about SpaceX ocean vessels, you can try our Czech overview or just visit the SpaceXFleet website.
Also this information is somehow out of date
There were three launches in quick succession, so I’ve decided to update the stats after they were all completed. It’s done now.
Thank you. My wishes were granted.!
Keep with this amazing Project.
Excuse me, but since SpaceX is not going to try to catch the fairings, to mee it seems better if it goes as a separated part, and start trying to count the “fished” or “salvaged” fairings, and reutilization.
But I don`t know where to get that info.
Good idea. I’ll rework the section about fairings a little when I find some time.
Thank you for that. It could also be interesting to follow the different Falcon 9 blocks. There was a discussion with Berger from Ars Technica, and since Soyuz have been flying since the ’50s; it could be interesting to see how the different models have been performing. Block 5 are the ones that are human rated, it seems there has be no problems with this iteration, and that could be a most direct comparison between Falcon 9 and Soyuz.
Hello. And thank you for your hard work.
I would like to propose, along the lines of “haviest payload”, to prepare a different subset for Falcon Heavy. It seems that we will have some more launches in the years to come, and it will bring you with:
Heaviest direct to Geosattaionary Orbir
Interplanetary
Moon orbit
Also, the Falcon has some missions like DART, that i don’t know if they are just LEO, GTO or direct flights.
Hi, thanks for the suggestions. I added “heaviest payload to GEO” and “heaviest FH payload to GTO” but I think that’s enough. There are many types of orbit and it’s not useful to try to track stats for all of them, the main ones are enough (LEO, GTO, GEO, overall). But later I’ll probably add Moon and Mars.
Wonderful sir, extremely brilliant. congratulations and may you continue to be blessed to help the mankind
Shortest time between launches is now 4 hours and 12 minutes (Starlink 2-8 and SES-18/19)
You’re right! I didn’t even realize. It’s been updated now. Thanks!
You are wellcome! Great stuff and great work!
Thank you for all your work!
You’re welcome. I’m glad you like the website!
stat “Highest Mass Launched to GEO on a Falcon Heavy” has changed with the last Heavy
Thanks for the reminder. This should now be fixed.
Interesting to see that in no time, the number of reused falcon launches will surpass all the launches of some of the Soyuz variants!!!!
It has already surpassed many rocket systems like the Ariane. Some booster have neen already launched more tiems than some rockets like the Saturn V. Than all the launches of Saturn V
It seems that the cadence is so high that this page is falling behind.