SpaceX Statistics
Jump to: Launches | Landings | Pads | Reusability | Dragon 1 | Crew Dragon | Cargo Dragon 2 | Starlink
Changelog:
- Apr 25, 2025 – Stats updated after the Starlink 6-74 launch
- Apr 22, 2025 – Stats updated after the Bandwagon-3 launch
- Apr 21, 2025 – Stats updated after the CRS-32 launch
- Apr 20, 2025 – Stats updated after the NROL-145 launch
- Apr 14, 2025 – Stats updated after the Starlink 6-73 launch
- Apr 13, 2025 – Stats updated after the NROL-192 and Starlink 12-17 launches
ASOG = A Shortfall of Gravitas (droneship), OCISLY = Of Course I Still Love You (droneship), JRTI = Just Read the Instructions (droneship), LZ = Landing Zone (on land), F9 = Falcon 9, FH = Falcon Heavy, LEO = Low Earth Orbit, GTO = Geostationary Transfer Orbit, GEO = Geostationary Earth Orbit
Orbital Launches
Launches Total (excl. Amos-6 and Crew Dragon in-flight abort test)
479 (5x Falcon 1, 463x Falcon 9, 11x Falcon Heavy)
Launches by Year
1 (2006), 1 (2007), 2 (2008), 1 (2009), 2 (2010), 0 (2011), 2 (2012), 3 (2013), 6 (2014), 7 (2015), 8 (2016), 18 (2017), 21 (2018), 13 (2019), 25 (2020), 31 (2021), 61 (2022), 96 (2023), 134 (2024), 47 (2025)
Mission Success (incl. Amos-6)
98.75% (Total); 40% (Falcon 1); 99.35 % (Falcon 9); 100% (Falcon Heavy)
Successful Launches since Last Mission Failure (Starlink 9-3)
111
Longest Stretch of Successful Missions in a Row
334 (from Iridium-1 to Türksat 6A)
Most Launches in a Calendar Year
134 (2024)
Most Launches in a Calendar Quarter
40 (Q4 2024)
Most Launches in a Calendar Month
16 (November 2024)
Shortest Time Between Launches
1h 5m (Starlink 8-10 / Starlink 9-5)
Shortest Time Between Launches from Same Pad
2d 9h 1m (SLC-40, Starlink 12-21 / Starlink 12-16)
Highest Mass Launched to LEO
17,500 kg (Starlink 6-39 and similar)
Highest Mass Launched to GTO on a Falcon 9
7,350 kg (Intelsat Galaxy 33/34)
Highest Mass Launched to GTO on a Falcon Heavy
~9,200 kg (Jupiter-3)
Highest Mass Launched to GEO on a Falcon Heavy
~6,750 kg (Viasat-3 Americas)
Lowest Mass Launched on a Falcon 9
330 kg (IXPE)
Shortest Time Between Static Fire (with Payload) and Launch:
14h 20m (Starlink 10-5)
Shortest Time Between Static Fire (without Payload) and Launch:
67 hours (Amos-17)
Booster Landings
» Detailed List of All SpaceX Booster Landings
Landing Attempts Total
448 (Total) – 358 (droneship), 90 (land)
Successful Landings Total
435 (Total) – 346 (droneship), 89 (land)
Successful Landings since Last Failure (Starlink 12-20)
21
Most Landing Successes in a Row
267 (from Starlink v1-17 to Starlink 10-5; counting Starlink 6-32 as a success)
Landing Success Rate Overall
97.10% (Overall), 33.3% (2015), 62.5% (2016), 100% (2017), 85.7% (2018), 93.75% (2019), 92% (2020), 96.77% (2021), 100% (2022), 100% (2023), 99.24% (2024), 97.83% (2025)
Landing Success Rate (on land)
98.89%
Landing Success Rate (on droneship)
96.65%
Landing Attempts on OCISLY
134 (7 of those were unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on JRTI (both Marmac 300 and 303)
118 (4 of those were unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on ASOG
106 (1 of those was unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on LZ-1
52 (1 of those was unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on LZ-2
12 (0 of those were unsuccessful)
Landing Attempts on LZ-4
26 (0 of those were unsuccessful)
Booster(s) with the Highest Number of Successful Landings
B1067 (27 landings)
Farthest distance during ASDS landing (F9)
690 km (JRTI during O3b mPOWER 2)
Farthest distance during ASDS landing (FH)
1234 km (OCISLY during STP-2)
Shortest Time Between Landing Attempts on OCISLY
2d 22h 22m (Starlink 11-8 / Starlink 11-6)
Shortest Time Between Landing Attempts on JRTI
4d 5h 10m (Starlink 6-68 / GSAT-N2)
Shortest Time Between Landing Attempts on ASOG
3d 12h 13m (Starlink 6-60 / Starlink 6-64)
F9 Landing with Highest Payload Mass to GTO
7,350 kg (Intelsat Galaxy 33/34)
F9 Landing with Highest Payload Mass to LEO
17,500 kg (Starlink 6-39 and similar)
Launch Pads
Launches from LC-39A: 107
Launches from SLC-40: 247 (excl. Amos-6)
Launches from SLC-4E: 121
Launches from Kwajalein: 5
Shortest Time Between Launches from LC-39A
5d 7h 9m (O3b mPOWER 4 / Starlink 12-2)
Shortest Time Between Launches from SLC-40
2d 9h 1m (SLC-40, Starlink 12-21 / Starlink 12-16)
Shortest Time Between Launches from SLC-4E
2d 22h 22m (Starlink 11-8 / Starlink 11-6)
Shortest Time Between Launches from Kwajalein
57 days (between the 3rd and 4th Falcon 1 launch)
Dragon 1
Dragon 1 Missions (incl. COTS)
22
Highest Upmass on a Dragon 1 CRS Mission
3,138 kg (CRS-8)
Lowest Upmass on a Dragon 1 CRS Mission
400 kg (CRS-1)
Longest Dragon 1 Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
CRS-9 (39d 11h 3m)
Shortest Dragon 1 CRS Mission (excl. CRS-7)
CRS-1 (20d 18h 48m)
Dragon 1 Recoveries
12 (6 of them once, 3 twice, 3 thrice)
Missions with a Reused Dragon 1
9
Reused Dragon 1 Capsules
6
Dragon 1 Capsules with the Most Launches
C106, C108 and C112 (3 missions)
Quickest Dragon 1 Turnaround (Splashdown to Launch)
418 days (CRS-16 / CRS-20)
Reusability
» Overview of All Block 5 Falcon Boosters
» Detailed List of All Fairing Recoveris
Number of Booster Reuses
405
Launches with a Reused Booster
397 (Total) – 5 (2017), 12 (2018), 8 (2019), 21 (2020), 29 (2021), 56 (2022), 92 (2023), 128 (2024), 45 (2025)
Share of F9/FH Launches with Reused Booster
83.58% (Total), 27% (2017), 57% (2018), 69.23% (2019), 80.77% (2020), 93.55% (2021), 91.8% (2022), 95.83% (2023), 95.52% (2024), 95.74% (2025)
Quickest Booster Turnaround (Launch-Launch or Launch-Static Fire)
9d 3h 39m (B1088.4, SPHEREx / NROL-57)
Booster(s) with Most Launches
B1067 (27 launches)
Maximum Altitude Reached by a Booster
247 km (Formosat-5)
Fairing Catch Attempts with Net
32 (9 of those were successful)
Number of Fairing Half Reuses
approx. 616
Missions with at Least One Reused Fairing
approx. 324
Highest Number of Reuses for a Particular Fairing
29
Share of F9/FH Launches with at Least One Reused Fairing (excl. Dragon Missions)
11.11% (2019), 38% (2020), 68% (2021), over 83.93% (2022), over 79.78% (2023), approx. 93.75% (2024), approx. 95.45% (2025)
Crew Dragon
Crew Dragon Missions
19
People Transported to Orbit
62
People Transported from Orbit
64
Crew Dragon Recoveries
17
Total Count of Crew Dragon Reuses
13
Crew Dragon Capsule(s) with the Most Launches
C206 (5 missions)
Quickest Crew Dragon Turnaround (Splashdown to Launch)
137 days (C207, Crew-1 / Inspiration4)
Longest Crew Dragon Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
Crew-8 (235 days)
Shortest Crew Dragon Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
Inspiration4 (71 hours)
Cargo Dragon 2
Cargo Dragon 2 Missions
12
Highest Upmass on a Cargo Dragon 2 Mission
3,528 kg (CRS-26)
Highest Downmass on a Cargo Dragon 2 Mission
2,002 kg (CRS-21)
Longest Cargo Dragon 2 Mission (Launch to Splashdown)
45d 14h 59m (CRS-26)
Cargo Dragon 2 Recoveries
9
Missions with a Reused Cargo Dragon 2
8
Dragon 2 Capsules with the Most Launches
C208, C209 (5 missions)
Quickest Cargo Dragon 2 Turnaround (Splashdown to Launch)
164 days (C209, CRS-22 / CRS-24)
Starlink
» Starlink Compendium
» Detailed Starlink stats from Jonathan McDowella
Satellites Launched
8330 (Total) – 2 (Tintin), 60 (Starlink v0.9), 1665 (Starlink v1.0), 2987 (Starlink v1.5), 3406 (Starlink v2-mini)
Satellites Deorbited (as of April 25, 2025)
1083 (Total) – 2 (Tintin), 60 (Starlink v0.9), 669 (Starlink v1.0), 236 (Starlink v1.5), 116 (Starlink v2-mini)
If you find a mistake or want to suggest a new statistic to track, let me know in the comments below!
I think “Most Landing Successes in a Row” should be 23, not 1. Great work, anyway!
You’re right. I somehow accidentally merged the stats for most successes in a row and successful landings since last failure. Thanks for letting me know, it’s fixed now.
Good Job! Congrats!
The dragon 2 has been reused (oh nvm it says cargo dragon)
Great statistics! Great work collecting and organizing all of it.
Suggestions:
Thanks!
Thanks for the suggestions but most of the stats you’re asking for are impossible to track by the public. And I’m not planning on tracking stats for other companies.
But I’ve added a legend for the abbreviations used.
I believe Inspiration4 and Starlink 2-1 have beaten the “Shortest time between launches” record
You’re right! I haven’t updated any of the stats with Inspiration4 data yet. Will do it soon.
Recovered Dragons 1
12 (6 of them once, 3 twice, 3 thrice)
“Dragons 1” is just odd. It should probably mimic “Dragon 1 Missions”, like “Dragon 1 Recoveries”.
Recovered Crew Dragons
5
Makes it sound like there are five capsules. Should probably mimic “Crew Dragon Missions”, like “Crew Dragon Recoveries”.
Crew Dragon Reuses
2
I’m not certain what this is tracking. If it means what “Dragon 1 Capsules with the Most Launches” means, then I think it’s correct as both Resilience and Endeavour now have two missions each. And the stat should probably be called “Crew Dragon Capsules with the Most Launches”.
If it means the equivalent of “Reused Cargo Dragon 2 Capsules”, then it should probably be “Reused Crew Dragon Capsules”, though this stat is just going to be the number of Crew Dragons built, minus any SpaceX haven’t got around to re-launching, which, unlike “Crew Dragon Capsules with the Most Launches”, is an uninteresting stat.
“Shorthest Dragon 1 CRS Mission” -> “Shortest”
You also have 98.42% for Falcon 9’s mission success rate. Given the extensive differences between the blocks, I think I’d break that down into F9 V1.0, F9 V1.1 and F9 v1.2+, as delineated by OML changes (read: tank stretches) between the versions.
You also seem to lack a list of “SpaceX Recovery Vessels”. With ASOG debuting, and Bob and Doug soon coming online, a dedicated page with pics and a bit of history (e.g. why Marmac 300 and 303 are called JRTI) might be of interest.
Cheers.
Thanks for the feedback! I’ve made some changes based on your suggestions. As for the details about SpaceX ocean vessels, you can try our Czech overview or just visit the SpaceXFleet website.
Also this information is somehow out of date
There were three launches in quick succession, so I’ve decided to update the stats after they were all completed. It’s done now.
Thank you. My wishes were granted.!
Keep with this amazing Project.
Excuse me, but since SpaceX is not going to try to catch the fairings, to mee it seems better if it goes as a separated part, and start trying to count the “fished” or “salvaged” fairings, and reutilization.
But I don`t know where to get that info.
Good idea. I’ll rework the section about fairings a little when I find some time.
Thank you for that. It could also be interesting to follow the different Falcon 9 blocks. There was a discussion with Berger from Ars Technica, and since Soyuz have been flying since the ’50s; it could be interesting to see how the different models have been performing. Block 5 are the ones that are human rated, it seems there has be no problems with this iteration, and that could be a most direct comparison between Falcon 9 and Soyuz.
Hello. And thank you for your hard work.
I would like to propose, along the lines of “haviest payload”, to prepare a different subset for Falcon Heavy. It seems that we will have some more launches in the years to come, and it will bring you with:
Heaviest direct to Geosattaionary Orbir
Interplanetary
Moon orbit
Also, the Falcon has some missions like DART, that i don’t know if they are just LEO, GTO or direct flights.
Hi, thanks for the suggestions. I added “heaviest payload to GEO” and “heaviest FH payload to GTO” but I think that’s enough. There are many types of orbit and it’s not useful to try to track stats for all of them, the main ones are enough (LEO, GTO, GEO, overall). But later I’ll probably add Moon and Mars.
Wonderful sir, extremely brilliant. congratulations and may you continue to be blessed to help the mankind
Shortest time between launches is now 4 hours and 12 minutes (Starlink 2-8 and SES-18/19)
You’re right! I didn’t even realize. It’s been updated now. Thanks!
You are wellcome! Great stuff and great work!
Thank you for all your work!
You’re welcome. I’m glad you like the website!
stat “Highest Mass Launched to GEO on a Falcon Heavy” has changed with the last Heavy
Thanks for the reminder. This should now be fixed.
Interesting to see that in no time, the number of reused falcon launches will surpass all the launches of some of the Soyuz variants!!!!
It has already surpassed many rocket systems like the Ariane. Some booster have neen already launched more tiems than some rockets like the Saturn V. Than all the launches of Saturn V
It seems that the cadence is so high that this page is falling behind.
thanks for all! “Most Landing Successes in a Row” shouldn’t be update to 160 after Psycke? thanks again!
You’re right! Forgot to update that stat. Should be fixed now.
Can we know the payload mass for transporter missions
Not really, there are too many unknowns, so you can only get rough estimates at best.
In Launches Total a 3 was passed, it says 3354
shortest time between landing attempts on JRTI is now between Starlink 8-10 and 8-11, isn’t it?
You’re right! This has now been updated.
Thank you , Scroochy.
One opportunity here:
Heras has gotten a very high scape velocity. I don’t know if you have this information, for Solar System exploration.
In the statistics section it lists a number for
Shortest Time Between Launches
1h 5m (Starlink 8-10 / Starlink 9-5)
Is that with both launches from the KSC and Cape Canaveral SFS, or was one in California and the other in Florida.
Today’s two launches, one from KSC pad 39A and the other from CCSFS SLC-40 at 4h 3m was the shortest I recall, but that means exactly nothing.
Starlink 8-10 and Starlink 9-5 launched from different coasts. I don’t really track Florida pads as a separate group, I don’t see the point.
In the topic Most Launches in a Calendar Quarter, Q4 has already equaled Q2
Oh, I missed that one. Thanks! This is now updated with the new Q4 record.
How about adding “Most flights of a booster in a calendar year”? Currently that record is 10 set by B1076 on 5 December 2024 and matched by B1080 on 23 December 2024
Thanks for the suggestion, but I currently don’t have a good way of tracking this type of stat.
Adding Starbase pad turnaround would be great!
I will add Starship stats at some point, but right now the launches are too experimental so most stats don’t make sense yet. Maybe once they start doing orbital launches.